Born in Philadelphia,
Charles Sheeler attended the School of Industrial
Art (1900-1903) and the Pennsylvania Academy of
the Fine Arts (1903-1906), studying with the William
Merritt Chase. With a fellow student, Morton Schamberg,
Sheeler set up a studio in Philadelphia in 1908.
In Europe the next year, he and Schamberg were
impressed by the elegant formalism of the Italian
Renaissance painters. In Paris they experienced
some of the ferment of modernism and saw the radical
manifestations of Pablo Picasso's and Georges
Braque's analytical cubism and the Fauve expressionism
of Henri Matisse's painting. After this trip Sheeler
devoted himself to working in essentially analytical
styles."
Modern American Charles Sheeler was born in Philadelphia
and studied in the School of Industrial Art and
the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art in Philadelphia.
Although he supported himself at that time as
an architectural photographer, he dabbled in painting
on weekends.
During the 1920s, Sheeler was associated with
a group of painters called the Precisionists,
known for their realistic style of painting. He
focused strongly on industrial subjects and was
a distinguished photographer of machines. He perfected
a method of achieving a photographic quality with
paint. Even when he painted in an abstract style
he was still concerned with achieving absolute
accuracy and exactness in his art.
The work of American painter Charles Sheeler is,
in its pragmatic association with the American
scene and its consistently lucid technique, central
to the precisionist style. His techniques varied
from photographic realism to modified abstraction.
A More Indepth View of Sheeler's Life
Charles Sheeler's photographs and paintings of
urban and industrial scenes revealed his interest
in the formal vocabulary of Cubism. He worked
for “advertising agencies (particularly
for Ford plants) and collaborated with fashion
magazines, while his painting developed into an
increasingly "immaculate" rendering
(www.bookrags.com). After 1932, he gave up photography,
using it solely as a model thereafter. His paintings
and drawings “are characterized by a formal
simplification, an impersonal style, and a precision
of the brushstroke, somewhat close to Demuth”
(Lucic 21). Sheeler described the heartland of
America, without falling victim to regionalist
isolation. His paintings of factories, Pennsylvania
farms, and Shaker furniture reflected his desire
to glorify a kind of progress specific to America,
where mechanical progress followed tradition.
In 1938, Charles Sheeler was commissioned by Fortune
magazine to produce six paintings extolling America's
industrial power. Sheeler visited power stations
across the nation, photographing selected sites
which became the basis for the paintings.' These
paintings, known collectively as Power, were reproduced
in a “portfolio supplement to the December,
1940, issue of Fortune and exhibited from December
2 to December 21, 1940 at Edith Halpert's Downtown
Gallery” (Lucic 20). The text of the Power
portfolio claimed that Sheeler depicted machines
not as "strange, inhuman masses of material,
but exquisite manifestations of human reason,"
because the machine was to the present what the
figure had been to the Renaissance.
Steam Turbine, the fifth in the series, was based
on one of the turbines at the Hudson Avenue Station
of the Brooklyn Edison Company, New York, and
then the world's largest steam power plant. The
curving, steam-filled loop dominates the composition;
in the foreground are other machines such as heat
exchangers, pumps, and automatic valves. Sheeler
concentrated on the “geometric perfection
and implicit power of the forms” (Lucic
12), as he had done since his first big industrial
commission, photographing Henry Ford's River Rouge
Plant outside Detroit, in 1927. However, in 1912,
after studying at the School of Industrial Art
and the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts
in Philadelphia, he began to support himself as
an architectural photographer in 1928; Sheeler
was commissioned to photograph the ocean liner,
the US.S. Majestic.
His work, Upper Deck (1929, Harvard University
Art Museums, Fogg Art Museum), based on that photograph,
was a turning point because, for the first time,
Sheeler discovered how to achieve photographic
qualities in paint. As he later recalled, "Starting
with Upper Deck I have sought to have a complete
conception of the picture established in my mind,
much as the architect completes his plans before
the work of bringing the house into existence
begins Sheeler consciously “sought an architectural
structure and an impersonal surface, devoid of
temperamental slashes of paint or layers suggesting
sequences of time” (Lucic 23). He wanted
to eliminate "the means to the end, meaning
the technique as far as possible and to present
the subject in itself without the distraction
of the means of achieving it . But in Sheeler's
best paintings, the impersonal surface shimmers;
it is like a still reflection in a pond, not just
a reflection of a single, unified image but an
image of concentration.
In Steam Turbine, the “precision of the
geometric structure, the subtlety of the paint
surface, and the nuances of color simultaneously
convey both the information of a photograph and
the qualities” of a painting (Lucic 12).
Critics were not always pleased with the obvious
relationship between photographs and paintings
in Sheeler's work. Milton Brown, perhaps his strongest
critic, noted in his review of the Power series
that the paintings were probably the most photographic
of Sheeler's works, lacking the abstract quality
of some of his earlier paintings. Brown found
the color "cold and unexpressive." His
criticism was that the paintings failed to capture
the "dynamic energy hidden within these engines
of power, the potentialities of movement, creation,
or destruction." But in saying that there
was "no longer a question of any such principle
as the relation of art to nature," (Lucic
14). Charles Sheeler died in Dobb’s Ferry,
New York, and May 7, 1965.
Biographical information:
www.bookrags.com/biography/charles-sheeler and
www.artburst.com/charlessheeler. |